ASG Advanced Surveillance Group, Inc.

Call us toll free, 24 hours a day to speak with one of our investigators.

Your call is strictly confidential

888.677.9700

direct e-mail: info@cheating
spousepi.com

Cheating Spouse Private Investigator Insights


Archive for July, 2006

Great story from CBS about the trouble casued by spouses taking seperate vacations

Saturday, July 29th, 2006

Separate Vacations Can Be Ticket To Divorce Court
Despite Dangers, These Types Of Trips On The Rise

Tamsen Fadal
Reporting

(CBS) NEW YORK When Glenn and Anne Driver said their vows 15 years ago it was “till death do us part.” But, Glenn’s solo trip almost ended their marriage.

“He took off and I wasn’t really good with it,” Anne remembers.

So, when Glenn returned the couple took a trip together: to see a marriage counselor.

“We were testing our boundaries and uh, you know, he was flexing his muscles and it didn’t sit well with me. Let’s take separate vacations. It’s one of the most sensitive subjects for couples,” marriage and family counselor Elena Lesserbruun said.

“If they’re not both comfortable, I don’t think it’s good for one to go off unilaterally,” she added.

Just asking can open a Pandora’s box of jealousy, said Lesserbruun, who added that resentment at being left behind, a feeling of exclusion and concerns about cheating also play a big role.

“If you’re constantly going on vacation separately, you’re not taking time to enjoy each other and building memories you can look back too,” she said.

But a separate vacation is no longer the road less traveled, according to Expedia.com, it’s actually on the rise. Ellen and Jeff Liebowitz have made it work. When she heads to Canyon Ranch each year, her husband Jeff takes off on mountain biking and rafting.

“It makes you appreciate the other person more, cause you miss them a little bit,” Jeff said.

Ellen agreed: “I don’t think it ever crossed our mind, like uh-oh, he’s going away again or anything like that.”

After much soul searching, Anne and Glenn have a learned to make some concessions. They travel together and separately, Anne said.

“You don’t always have to do everything together, chained to the hip,” Anne said.

Experts said if you want to take separate vacations don’t go because you are trying to escape from your spouse, go because you know it will reinforce a strong relationship. And set some vacations rules: discussing the trip beforehand, limiting alcohol while away, and avoid leaving your spouse home alone for too long.

(© MMVI, CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved.)

Cheating Article from Daily Mail

Friday, July 28th, 2006

Is your man Mr Right or Mr Write Off?
By AMANDA PLATELL, Daily Mail 00:02am 28th July 2006

When Jennifer Aniston and Vince Vaughn’s relationship finally collapses in their new movie The Break-Up, there is always a stunned silence in the mostly female audience — a sigh of collective sadness, of universal recognition.

This is not because the film reminds women of the utter heartbreak of a doomed love affair, but because in real life the adorable Jennifer Aniston reminds us of a newer, more devastating social trend: the emergence not of Mr Right but his wicked twin Mr Write Off — as in he’s a total write-off. He may not be a womaniser, but he is a serial swine.

He woos a woman in her 20s, stays with her for eight to ten years — long enough to give her every expectation that they will marry, have a family and spend the rest of their lives together. Then — and here’s the rub — he dumps her for a younger woman with whom he usually promptly has the child his ex so longed for.

The most devastating aspect of Mr Write Off, who has a highly developed ability to move on without a backward glance, is that he dumps a woman literally in no-man’s land.

Bitter and desperate, in her late 30s, she must start all over again to try to find another partner and, more urgently, a father for the children she may soon be too late to have.

So when women cry watching The Break-Up, they are actually identifying with Aniston’s real-life dilemma. She met Brad Pitt in 1998, but after nearly seven years together — but no children — they separated. Just months later he was in Angelina Jolie’s bed — producing a bouncing baby girl.

Brad Pitt is the ultimate Mr Write Off. He was 41 when they split. Jolie was in her late 20s and Aniston in her mid-30s. Within a year of their separation, he and Jolie had a child.

And whereas it is easy to dismiss this as a tale of Hollywood heartbreak, we see the same social trend all around us in Britain. Most women dumped by Mr Write Off are left with literally nothing but the memories.

These women, in the twilight of their fertility, who believed they had their lives sorted, are dumped with no no partner and, crucially, no babies.

Most interesting is that this is not a problem predominantly on our council estates, but a middle-class phenomenon.

It is happening to well-educated, highly successful, post-feminist women who thought they could have it all when they wanted it; who postponed their families to enjoy the ‘me’ decade in their late 20s and early 30s. Families and commitment could wait.

But they didn’t. Or at least he didn’t. Of course, men are mostly culpable for this trend. But women must shoulder some of the blame, too. As a society, we have loosened the obligations on both men and women to commit to one another permanently.

It is an inevitable and long-predicted by-product of a co-habitee society. With our ultimate desire for a father for our children, and a fertility window that slams shut sooner than any of us ever expect, women were always going to lose out when we replaced marriage with co-habitation.

Marriage protects a woman in a way that living together does not. We have made it so easy to move in together, to have the appearance of a stable relationship — but one of the reasons marriages work is they are harder to get out of.

And who can blame men for taking advantage of a system women created? The feminist movement wanted to break women free from the chains of marriage; and it succeeded. The Government, especially this Labour Government, finished the job.

You don’t have to look far to find the heartbreak caused by Mr Write Off.

Vanessa Short, 35, is a media executive and lives alone in Wimbledon. Her 38-year-old boyfriend Peter, a businessman, left her for a 26-year-old ten months ago.

‘For the past ten months, I’ve found myself looking at every man I meet as potential husband and father material, rather than letting my hair down and enjoying dating again,’ Vanessa says.

‘All I can think is: “I’m 35, my biological clock is ticking loudly, will I ever meet The One?” ‘Peter left me in October 2005 when I discovered he was having an affair with a colleague nine years my junior.

‘We’d been together for five years but had endured a rough six months after both being promoted in our respective jobs. We were each working up to 12 hours a day and would barely say a word to one another before we collapsed into bed at night.

‘I suppose that was why we never got round to getting married. Sex was off the agenda as we were so tired, and resentment started to build at the lack of time we spent as a couple.

‘And as Peter began to work an increasing number of weekends, I grew suspicious that he might be seeing someone else. But I could never muster the courage to ask outright.

Affair

One night, I’d been for after-work drinks and I let rip, demanding to know if Peter was having an affair. When he said that he was and that his mistress was only 26, I was devastated. He moved out of our home the same night. ‘As he slammed the door behind him, I cried. I couldn’t believe the man I’d built my hopes and dreams around, and whom I wanted as the father of my children, had just abandoned me to be with someone else.’

Vanessa’s story follows a well-worn pattern. The couple had been introduced at university, dated for a year, drifted apart and then met again when his career was established.

‘Peter was as handsome as ever, 6ft 5in tall, with dark hair and blue eyes. He was considerably wealthier than when we’d dated as students. ‘He called the following day and asked if I’d like to go on a date. A week later, after dinner and drinks, we made love and it was better than I remembered.

‘“I knew I’d come back to you eventually,” he said. Everything was falling into place and my mind whirred with thoughts of weddings and babies as our relationship sped along. After six months, he moved into my three-bedroom flat in Wimbledon.

Over the next few years, we went on fantastic holidays to places like Italy and Slovakia. We’d often talk about spending our lives together and he always said he wanted to have babies with me.

‘Then came the six months from hell, the affair with the 26-year-old and the end of our relationship. Now, I worry terribly that I won’t find Mr Right in time to enjoy being with him and have a family before I hit 40.

‘When I meet a man, I feel as if I have to know at once whether things might get serious, because if not then I haven’t got time to waste on him, which is a terrible thing to have to say.

‘I’ve even been asking myself whether I really need a man to have a child and am thinking about adopting, such is my fear of not meeting anyone soon.

‘I don’t think men my age want a woman my age. Their instinct is to go for someone younger — especially if he has reservations about having children.’

And she’s right. While men can easily delay becoming a parent until their 40s and well beyond, women cannot. And there are few things that turn a single man off quicker than a woman desperate for a child.

Paula Bass, 33, knows that well. She works in PR and lives in Fulham, West London. Her boyfriend Julian, 36, a media sales executive, left her nine months ago to have a string of flings with younger women. They’d been together for four years.

‘I’m petrified I won’t meet Mr Right before my body clock stops ticking,’ says Paula. ‘I’m constantly being asked, “Why are you single?” — but it’s not through choice.

‘I’ve always been hugely maternal. I’d imagined that by the time I was 30 I’d be married and have kids.

‘When I met Julian in a bar in autumn 2001, I thought: “This could be it.” He was dashing, tall, had a great sense of humour and was wealthy to boot. The chemistry between us was indescribable.

‘He was the perfect gentleman. After our first date, he took me home and kissed me on the doorstep. I knew I could really fall for him, and when we went to his parents’ apartment in Paris for New Year two months later, we came home totally in love.

‘We had amazing holidays together and talked about marriage and children. But a couple of years into the relationship, he admitted he wasn’t too keen on the idea of children and said he wanted to focus on his career.

‘He felt I should, too, and emphasised that, being younger than him, I shouldn’t worry about having a family just yet.

‘That set alarm bells ringing. But I was caught in a vicious circle of loving Julian to death and just hoping that one day he’d change his mind.

‘As I approached my 32nd birthday, I began to panic. What if Julian didn’t change his mind? What if we didn’t have children together and I missed my chance to be a mother? I was consumed by the horror that I may not have children, while he threw all his energy into his career.

‘In November last year we separated. He said he couldn’t continue with the relationship because he did not want children.

Flings

‘Julian began a series of flings with women in their 20s and moved to Paris. By dating women younger than me, I believe he was evading the subject of having children for that bit longer.

‘Now I’m single again and one of the last remaining girls in my group to settle down. I’ve had a few disastrous dates with men who just want sex — but I’m not interested because I’m looking for a husband and father now and my experience with Julian has finely tuned my antenna.

‘I’d love to meet a softer, less career-focused man now because my agenda is so different. But in my deepest, darkest, Bridget Jones moments, I’m terrified I won’t find Mr Right in time.

‘And anyway, I thought I had found Mr Right in Julian — except he turned out to be Mr Write Off.’ Of course, women can have children throughout their 40s, even up to their 60s now with donor eggs and IVF. But the chances of having a child naturally decrease drastically every year over 35.

One in four 40-year-old women does not have any children — and most of these are not by choice. Mostly they are left without the families they long for because they’ve made the wrong choices about men.

Another woman abandoned by Mr Write Off is Maggie Briggs, a 37-year-old publicist from Barnes, South-West London. She says: ‘I had a volatile relationship with Jerry, a 36-year-old engineer, for seven years.

‘In all that time, we had never got round to getting married. I suppose we had both thrown ourselves into our careers and wanted to focus on them in our early 30s.

‘Then, about two years ago, Jerry was sent to Manchester on a big contract and we started leading separate lives, meeting up only at weekends.

‘After a while, he started making excuses not to come back to London some weekends, and it wasn’t too long before I found out he was seeing another, younger woman he’d met in Manchester.

‘When I found out, he begged me to forgive him — and because I was so desperate to marry him and to start a family, I did. However, it was only a few weeks before I discovered that he was still seeing her.

‘And then she played her trump card. She found out where I lived and sent her friend round to tell me that she was pregnant by him.

Faced with his infidelity and the profound repercussions for my future and my chances of motherhood, I realised that I didn’t want any more to do with him.

‘It was a devastating betrayal because he’d always been meticulous about making sure that I didn’t fall pregnant.

‘I knew that for him to have got her pregnant meant that, despite his protestations, he must have felt more for her than he made out. Sure enough, he has now set up home with her and they have a baby boy.

‘I feel incredible bitterness that I wasted my best child-bearing years on him. But something inside me died when I knew his girlfriend was pregnant, so I don’t regret the fact that we’ve split.

‘Now I’m resigned to the fact that, unless I’m extremely lucky, I’ll probably go through life childless.’

Part of the problem, surely, is that feminism taught a generation of women that they did not need men and they did not need marriage. We enabled men to become commitment-phobes.

What man wouldn’t at least consider trading in his 30-something partner for a nubile 20-something, given the opportunity? What man would not hang onto his youth until the very last minute?

It is part of the modern Alpha male psyche to hunt and gather — but now he hunts women and gathers partners.

And with so many women putting motherhood off, they can make themselves vulnerable to the Alpha male who simply cuts and runs. The simple fact is that it is more difficult for a decent man to leave a relationship if there are children.

That’s why Mr Write Off avoids them at all costs. And what are we left with? An increasing number of men who think nothing of robbing a woman of the best child-rearing years of her life. And a new set of women left not holding the baby. It’s a social tragedy in the making.

Interesting Quote from a unfaithful woman who got what she deserved

Thursday, July 27th, 2006

Found in a UK Advice Column

All alone after I cheated

I had a great relationship with this man for six years until I ended up having an affair with another man who I fell in love with. He left me as I wasn’t ready to leave my relationship.

Now the man of seven years is leaving me as he found out about the affair. I am just lost, sad, alone and so depressed. I loved them both and want one of them back.

CBS News reports on Why Men Cheat

Wednesday, July 26th, 2006

Why Do Men Cheat?
In Light Of Christie Brinkley’s Woes, Two Pundits Ponder Question

NEW YORK, July 20, 2006
Guests Stephen Perrine, Editor- in-Chief Best Life magazine and Nicole Beland, Deputy Editor, Women’s Health magazineStephen Perrine and Nicole Beland on The Early Show Thursday. (CBS/The Early Show)

(CBS) It’s the extramarital affair that has everybody talking.

Peter Cook, the husband of former supermodel Christie Brinkley, is accused of carrying on an affair with a 19-year-old named Diana Bianchi.

Brinkley and Cook are now separated, after 10 years of marriage.

And the question everyone’s asking is, “Why would anyone cheat on Christie Brinkley?” And that begs the more general question of what prompts men to cheat, period.

Stephen Perrine, editor in chief of BestLife magazine, and Nicole Beland, deputy editor of Women’s Health magazine, discussed it all on The Early Show Thursday with co-anchor Hannah Storm.

“Why,” Storm wanted to know, “would a man cheat on someone gorgeous like Christie Brinkley? It’s happened to … (other) beautiful, successful women (as well).”

“Successful, powerful women,” Perrine said. “And a lot of times, the guy is cheating with someone not quite so powerful, maybe less threatening. In this instance, it’s really interesting, because the first thing Cook did when he (allegedly) wanted to begin an affair with her was offer her a job, and created a position where he was in power.”

“So,” Storm followed up, “we’re saying that this is really not all about sex. In fact, it might be about ego?”

“I think,” Beland responded, “it’s not all about sex, although 80 percent of men who do cheat on their wives, they say it’s about sex. But I think it comes down to one thing, and that’s integrity. There are a lot of reasons why you might feel an urge to cheat on your spouse, but there’s one reason you don’t, and that’s because you have respect for your vows. … I think (men who cheat on their wives) have a weakness of character.”

“It’s definitely a little softness there in the moral core, absolutely,” Perrine agreed.

Cook is 47, Bianchi is 19 and Brinkley is 52, so Storm asked how age might be a factor.

“Again,” Perrine suggested, “I think it’s that power dynamic. An impressionable woman might worship you and think you’re great.”

“I don’t think it’s so much fear of getting old (on the man’s part),” Beland offered, “as much as it is about power. … I do think, when a man is very insecure, he doesn’t want to feel threatened, he wants to feel as if he’s in control, so he goes for a young woman, who’s more malleable.”

Great Article on Privacy and your Car

Tuesday, July 25th, 2006

Driving may put toll on privacy
Paying for roads takes wired route

By ARIEL HART
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Published on: 07/24/06

Imagine a database that tracks your driving for miles. Or a car that records every inch you drive, everywhere. Or high-tech cameras that look in your car, analyze and record what they see.

All are serious government initiatives, responding in part to a national transportation funding crunch. Many states and counties have thrown up their hands at the ability of traditional road budgets to maintain, much less build, the roads they need. They are turning to other sources of money, including toll roads, often jump-started with private investment.
Related stories:
• Day 1: The end of free-ways?
• What readers are saying

And these roads are wired.

Planners and scientists are working on a range of high-tech systems they hope will save money, run roads more efficiently and help pay for road projects. They say privacy will be protected.

Privacy advocates, however, aren’t so sure. They fear it will be easier than people know for governments, private investigators and hackers to find unintended uses for the data this new technology would record.

“It’s really not even a question of will there be mission creep. It’s a question of how much or in what direction will it go,” said Jim Harper, editor of the privacy Web site privacilla.org and director of information policy studies at the Cato Institute, a Washington think tank.

“You build it for the good purposes, and it’s easily convertible for the purposes you don’t want.”

For Georgia, the technology question may be how to count passengers in a car. On I-75, I-575 and possibly Ga. 400 and others, the state’s leaders are planning high-occupancy toll (HOT) lanes, which would be free to car pools but would cost solo drivers who want to get out of congestion.

The tolling would be done electronically, with toll gate sensors blipping wallet-sized transponders perhaps stuck on windshields like Ga. 400 Cruise Cards. The equipment would probably keep billing records of where and when a car hit the tolls.

Ron Marino, a Citigroup managing director who helps Georgia finance projects, said at a conference recently that such systems represent “the adaptation of defense technology into our overall domestic living on a daily basis.”

The state Department of Transportation would probably decide what technology road companies could install on major Georgia roads.

Right now the only method of counting the number of people in cars is highway troopers’ eyeballs. That will change, perhaps within a year. According to industry salesmen and a report by the McCormick Rankin Corp., a Canadian transportation engineering firm, research — often derived from existing auto-industry technology — has suggested a number of ways to count drivers whizzing by toll sensors:

• Counting heartbeats.

• Hearing breaths.

• Feeling body heat.

• Reading fingerprints.

• Sensing human skin moisture.

The federal government is putting $16.5 million into a study that might help Congress scrap its central source of funding for roads, the gas tax. Many policymakers view the gas tax as outdated, and would like to replace it with a mileage charge.

In that study, 2,700 drivers in six areas, including North Carolina’s Research Triangle, are slated to hit the road starting this October in cars with GPS monitors that record where they drive, hoping to develop a system that bills for every mile driven, said David Forkenbrock, a University of Iowa professor who is conducting the study. It would divide the mileage payments among the governments and companies that owned those roads. The results of the four-year study will go to Congress and the Treasury and Transportation departments, Forkenbrock said.

Forkenbrock added that governments won’t be able to tell who the money is coming from and who traveled where. Some experts, such as David Klinges, a managing director at the finance firm Bear Stearns, believe the whole country will likely adopt such a system within 30 years.

Oregon has a simpler pilot program with 280 drivers. It bills drivers per mile driven in Oregon, with a higher charge for miles driven in rush-hour metro Portland.

James Whitty, manager of Oregon’s office of Innovative Partnerships and Alternative Funding, oversees that program. He conceded that if only minimal records are kept to satisfy privacy hawks, then drivers who want to challenge billing mistakes — what if you get a $300 bill when you know you didn’t drive at all? — won’t have much recourse.

“That’s for a state legislature to wrestle with, what is the proper balance,” he said.

On top of all that, the federal government has renewed interest in having cars communicate with each other and the roadside, to warn drivers who are heading into accidents. The idea would necessitate persuading the auto industry and transportation departments to install communication technology between all new cars and all major roadways.

If all cars could be controlled to avoid collisions, more lanes could be squeezed in a road, with cars inches apart, said Samuel Johnson, chief of information technology at San Diego’s regional planning association.

These programs are years, if not decades, away. But long before most drivers set eyes on the hardware, the decisions that affect their privacy would already have been made.

When the Social Security number was created in 1936, it was never intended for use as anything but an internal account number with the Social Security Administration. But the number became the individual’s national identification number and a tool for identity theft.

“You can make data anonymous by policy and it’s just a matter of time before policy breaks down,” said Dorothy Glancy, a law professor at Santa Clara University who directed a federally-funded research project on transportation technology. “You have to engineer [privacy] into the system.”

People can think up unexpected uses both illegal and legal. A database of drive times and locations paired with occupant data “certainly will have a lot of private investigators wanting to get it because of the cheating spouse thing,” said Kelly Riddle, a San Antonio private detective and a nationally recognized investigator.

Harper, the privacy Web site editor, foresees more serious police or national security uses. “We’ve seen already that they feel they benefit from monitoring telephone conversations, financial traffic data — why not automobile traffic data?”

Harper also cited worries about technology hackers. “There’s certainly security concerns in that hackers could break into the system and clone the computer system in your car and go riding around on your dime.”

Georgia’s State Road and Tollway Authority rarely receives subpoenas, but toll authorities in other states do. Ga. 400 toll drivers’ data is private unless a judge orders it disclosed, said Lisa Thompson, a spokeswoman for SRTA.

Just because data is ordered to be kept safe doesn’t mean it is. When the Albany Times Union decided to test out the privacy of New York’s electronic tolling system in 1999, a private detective the newspaper hired had an editor’s toll records within the hour. He’d started out with just the man’s name and hometown.

“The system relies on proper training and it didn’t work,” said the editor, Rob Brill.

Technology is just part and parcel of the brave new world of roads. Already it can blip a card in a windshield to send a bill, photograph a license plate to levy a fine, sense a car’s weight or track a cell phone anonymously to monitor traffic patterns — and does, in Georgia.

The technology can be helpful, by letting the Department of Transportation know whether a road needs fixing, warning drivers of congestion ahead, or tripping traffic light changes. The 200,000 Ga. 400 drivers with Cruise Cards already are tracked at one point, with their moves through the toll plaza date-stamped in their accounts. But looking in every car, and counting passengers inside, is something new.

With the sudden popularity of high-occupancy toll lanes, the time is ripe for it, said Jim Alves, director of intelligent transportation for JAI Pulnix, a high-tech camera company.

“Industry reacts to a market need that is close enough in time to reap a return on their investment,” said Alves, who hopes his company’s cameras will be chosen for a testing program in San Diego.

“There’s so much talk going on with HOT lanes that a lot of companies are [developing products],” he said.

Five HOT lane systems are in operation in the U.S. Twenty others are being implemented or studied, said Bob Poole, a public-private road projects advocate from the Reason Foundation in California.

San Diego’s HOT lane system is already operating, but is considering adding technology to count cars’ occupants. The San Diego Association of Governments emphasizes that the public will have a say before it tests anything.

In Georgia, DOT Commissioner Harold Linnenkohl said the state intends to protect privacy. He said it’s too early to know what technology Georgia would use and who — including law enforcement — would have access to the data.

“I think we can very safely say that we are interested in using the most advanced technology possible,” Linnenkohl added. “And if that technology does progress to a point where we do not have to have any physical human body out there doing some type of monitoring, that would be where we would like to be.”

Staff researcher Richard Hallman contributed to this article.

Pay attention to the e-mail trail

Wednesday, July 19th, 2006

Great story about what people find in email posted by the OC Register and Scaramento Bee

Be careful what you write, experts say, because the whole world – including your boss and your spouse – could know it tomorrow.

By CYNTHIA HUBERT
The Sacramento Bee

MSNBC host Keith Olbermann probably assumed he was making a private joke when he described a colleague as “dumber than a suitcase of rocks” in an e-mail message.

Big mistake.

Last month, his comments about fellow TV personality Rita Cosby showed up in the New York Daily News, and Olbermann had some explaining to do.

In a world where personal missives can instantly tour the globe with a click of the “send” or “forward” button, others have suffered far greater consequences. When they get into the wrong hands, indiscreet e-mails can cost people jobs, clients, business deals, even marriages.

“People are enormously careless about e-mail, until they get burned,” said Atlanta attorney John Mayoue. Electronic messages, Mayoue said, have become “the best, most foolproof” way of outing cheating spouses in divorce cases, and they can cause all kinds of other problems for unsuspecting senders.

According to an annual survey by the technology firm Proofpoint, nearly 40 percent of companies employ staffers to read other employees’ e-mails, and more and more workers are losing jobs for violating e-mail policies. Incendiary e-mails have most famously been used to prove criminal charges against Enron founder Kenneth Lay, who died July 5.

If you want to make sure electronic messages never come back to bite you, said Mayoue, assume everything that you write is being monitored, copied, printed, forwarded.

“Never, ever write anything in an e-mail that you wouldn’t want on the front page of The New York Times,” said Suzanne Bates, author of the book “Speak Like a CEO, Secrets to Commanding Attention and Getting Results.” Unless you install special software that prevents recipients from forwarding your message, it might as well be on a billboard, she said.

In the legal field, e-mail has spawned a cottage industry of specialists who mine electronic messages to prove infidelity, character flaws and even crime, said Sacramento attorney Paul Hemesath.

BE A SMARTER SENDER

Author, consultant and former Yahoo executive Tim Sanders offers the following top tips of e-mail etiquette:

• Never say no: “E-mail is for yes, maybe, passing on information or answering a question. If you’re going to say no, pick up the phone.”

• Don’t CC Dad: “Try to limit CCing your boss or parents. The person you are sending the e-mail (to) can become rather resentful.”

• Don’t send e-mail with “hot eyelids”: “Never send an e-mail when you’re mad. Touch your fingers to your eyelids and if they’re hot, put the e-mail into the drafts box and revisit once you’ve calmed down.”

• Stop replying to all: “Erase the ‘reply all’ from your e-mail. Take the time to think who the e-mail really needs to go to.”

• Consider the time: “If you are a boss, don’t send company e-mails throughout the night. If your employees see you working late, they will feel they have to as well. This could cause a very resentful workplace.”

Florida Infidelity on the Rise

Tuesday, July 18th, 2006

June 2006 was the single largest month of infidelity case requests taken by our office ever. It is unclear whats going on in Florida, but June is the top of an ever increasing numebr of infidelity cases in Florida, particularly in south east florida.


Bad Behavior has blocked 2924 access attempts in the last 7 days.

Important Information about Private Investigations:

If you feel that your husband, wife, boy friend or girl friend is cheating on you, be sure to tell us eveything. As your private investigator, we are only able to get you the proof and evidence you need if you tell us the whole story. Anything less can have a dramatic affect on our ability to get you the information you seek. Although we are among the best private investigators in the industry specializing in infidelity and cheating cases who are recognized experts in court, we are not magicians! We cannot make things exist that don’t. We cannot find infidelity where it does not exist and sometimes, despite signs to the contrary, there is no infidelity or it is too infrequent or too well hidden to be found.

Accordingly, we do not guarantee any outcome on any case.

CheatingSpousePI.com is owned and operated by Advanced Surveillance Group, Licensed Private Detectives based in Detroit, Michigan. The agency works on cases nationwide and also contracts with licensed private investigators in other states as needed.

Alaska | Alabama | Arizona: Phoenix | Arkansas | California: Los Angeles, San Diego, San Francisco, San Jose | Colorado: Denver | Connecticut | Delaware | Washington DC | Florida: Miami, Boca Raton, Fort Lauderdale, Tampa, Clearwater, Orlando, Daytona, West Palm Beach, Naples, Fort Myers, Jacksonville | Georgia | Hawaii | Idaho | Illinois: Chicago | Indiana: Indianapolis | Iowa | Kansas | Kentucky | Louisiana | Maine | Maryland| Massachusetts: Boston | Michigan | Minnesota | Mississippi | Missouri | Montana | Nebraska | Nevada | New Hampshire | New Jersey | New Mexico | New York | North Carolina | North Dakota | Ohio | Oklahoma | Oregon | Pennsylvania: Pittsburgh | Rhode Island | South Carolina | South Dakota | Tennessee | Texas: Dallas, Houston | Utah | Vermont | Virginia | Washington | West Virginia | Wisconsin | Wyoming

Cancun Mexico | Cabo San Lucas Mexico |
This site is Copyrighted ©2010. Unauthorized use in part or in full is strictly prohibited and violations will be acted upon.
Site designed by Amorfo developed by Pistonbroke